How Medicare Advantage plans avoided auditors, overcharged taxpayers by millions

[ad_1]

In April 2016, government auditors asked a Blue Cross Medicare Advantage health plan in Minnesota to turn over medical records of patients treated by a podiatry practice whose owner had been indicted for fraud.

Medicare had paid the Blue Cross plan more than $20,000 to cover the care of 11 patients seen by Aggeus Healthcare, a chain of podiatry clinics, in 2011.

Blue Cross said it couldn’t locate any records to justify the payments because Aggeus shut down in the wake of the indictment, which included charges of falsifying patient medical files. So Blue Cross asked the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for a “hardship” exemption to a strict requirement that health plans retain these files in the event of an audit.

CMS granted the request and auditors removed the 11 patients from a random sample of 201 Blue Cross plan members whose records were reviewed.

A review of 90 government audits, released exclusively to KHN in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, reveals that health insurers that issue Medicare Advantage plans have repeatedly tried to sidestep regulations requiring them to document medical conditions the government paid them to treat.

The audits, the most recent ones the agency has completed, sought to validate payments to Medicare Advantage health plans for 2011 through 2013.

As KHN reported late last month, auditors uncovered millions of dollars in improper payments — citing overcharges of more than $1,000 per patient a year on average — by nearly two dozen health plans.

The hardship requests, together with other documents obtained by KHN through the lawsuit, shed light on the secretive audit process that Medicare relies on to hold accountable the increasingly popular Medicare Advantage health plans — which are an alternative to original Medicare and primarily run by major insurance companies.

Reacting to the audit findings, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) called for “aggressive oversight” to recoup overcharges.

“CMS must aggressively use every tool at its disposal to ensure that it’s efficiently identifying Medicare Advantage fraud and working with the Justice Department to prosecute and recover improper payments,” Grassley said in a written statement to KHN.

Medicare reimburses Medicare Advantage plans using a complex formula called a risk score that computes higher rates for sicker patients and lower ones for healthier people.

But federal officials rarely demand documentation to verify that patients have these conditions, or that they are as serious as claimed. Only about 5% of Medicare Advantage plans are audited yearly.

When auditors came calling, the previously hidden CMS records show, they often found little or no support for diagnoses submitted by the Advantage plans, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, or vascular disease. Though auditors look at the records of a relatively small sample of patients, they can extrapolate the error rate to the broad population of patients in the Medicare Advantage health plan and calculate millions of dollars in overpayments.

Overall, CMS auditors flagged diagnostic billing codes — which show what patients were treated for — as invalid more than 8,600 times. The audits covered records for 18,090 patients over the three-year period.

In many cases, auditors found that the medical credentials of the healthcare provider who made the diagnosis were unclear, the records provided were unacceptable, or the record lacked a signature as required. Other files bore the wrong patient’s name or were missing altogether.

The rates of billing codes rejected by auditors varied widely across the 90 audits. The rate of invalid codes topped 80% at Touchstone Health, a defunct New York HMO, according to CMS records. The company also was shown to have the highest average annual overcharges — $5,888 per patient billed to the government.

By contrast, seven health plans had fewer than 10% of their codes flagged.

Not a Modern Healthcare subscriber? Sign up today.

[ad_2]

Source link

Related Posts

Is it time to end 340B? – Healthcare Economist

[ad_1] A Health Affiairs Forefront article by DiGiorgio (2023) argues the 340B has outlived its purposes. He writes:  By mandating that drug…

A state-by-state look at the impact of Medicaid determinations

[ad_1] For Medicaid insurers, the looming loss of coverage threatens a financial shock. An estimated 15 million of the 91 million people with Medicaid—or 16.5%—are expected to…

General Catalyst launches at-home startup amid economic uncertainty

[ad_1] General Catalyst is launching a digital health startup with a $25 million investment, betting that demand for at-home care outweighs the challenging macroeconomic environment.  The startup,…

In the era of public health threats, CDC modernization is a race against the clock

[ad_1] In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and widespread criticism of the response from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Director Rochelle Walensky has called…

Connecticut-based Covenant Health terminates merger with Day Kimball

[ad_1] PUTNAM, Conn. — A Catholic-run healthcare system has withdrawn its application to affiliate with Day Kimball Healthcare, an independent, financially struggling hospital and healthcare system in…

Google tackles Medicaid redeterminations by updating search algorithm

[ad_1] Google is helping people navigate Medicaid redeterminations with the latest update to its search algorithm, the tech giant said Tuesday morning.  Google announced several new healthcare initiatives…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: